The complexity you can see

Tracy Hazzard wanted to simplify her podcast. After years of running The Binge Factor as an interview show, she decided to pivot to a “deconstructed” format—reviewing and analyzing other podcasts instead of hosting guests. The math seemed obvious: no more scheduling, no more pre-calls, no more coordinating calendars with strangers. She could just sit down and record whenever she wanted.

It didn’t work out that way.

When I do an interview, I just would listen to the first episode, the last episode, and one in the middle that I liked. And that was it. And so prep took an hour and a half. And it was just in my head and a few notes and I’m done. But this prep work is a lot more details. We have to check their websites and go through the analysis of the show, listen to see if it’s changed over time. Like it’s just taken on this beast of preparation.

The format change eliminated visible complexity—the back-and-forth emails, the timezone math, the occasional guest who shows up flat. But it introduced invisible complexity: deep research, comprehensive listening, detailed analysis. Hazzard’s conclusion was blunt: “I thought I was making my life easier. I made it harder.”

This miscalculation reveals something worth examining. Podcasters tend to see complexity where it’s most annoying—in the friction points that interrupt their day. Scheduling feels complex because it involves other people. Pre-calls feel complex because they’re calendar items. Guest no-shows feel complex because they’re emergencies.

But annoyance isn’t the same as effort. The guest interview format had a hidden efficiency: other people do much of the work for you. They bring stories, expertise, energy. They carry half the conversation. Your job is mostly to show up curious and ask good questions. The prep that felt like “just an hour and a half” was actually the whole job.

When Hazzard stripped away the guests, she stripped away their contributions too. Now the content had to come entirely from her own research and analysis. The calendar got simpler. The actual work got harder.

This pattern shows up everywhere in podcast production. We notice the complexity we can see—the software that crashes, the editing that drags on, the equipment that fails. We rarely notice the complexity we’ve learned to handle automatically, the workflows that have become invisible through repetition.

So when we try to simplify, we often cut the wrong things. We eliminate the annoying-but-efficient and keep the smooth-but-demanding. We optimize for how our process feels rather than where our time actually goes.

The question isn’t “what’s frustrating?” It’s “what’s actually doing the work?” Sometimes the scheduling hassle and the duds are the price you pay for a format that carries itself once you hit record.


This field note references the PodTalk podcast episode “Deconstructed with Tracy Hazzard,” published April 28, 2025.